But hey, it is still fun while we lived in the delusions of it giving us freedom.

The time has come, I truly hope, that the world wakes up to a stark reality: Bitcoin and the entire concept of blockchain technology were not the brainchild of some lone, altruistic coding genius named Satoshi Nakamoto. I wish, I pray, we universally agree that this was, from the jump, a strategic rollout by covert government agencies. The true, long-game purpose? To pave the way for a Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC) — the ultimate instrument designed to completely take over and centralize global finance and the existing system of money management.

This grand deception shouldn’t shock anyone, especially when we examine the historical patterns of global technology adoption. Look closely at how new tools and services have been introduced over the years. Consider Google Maps: this wasn’t just a friendly service; it was reportedly a sophisticated CIA project. Its real function was to use Google’s vast services and our mobile devices to crowdsource the precise geo-mapping of the entire planet. Why physically deploy agents when you can get millions of people to freely share every single detail and location datum you need?

Then there’s the poster child for unlimited data collection: Facebook and all associated technologies i.e. Instagram and WhatsApp. This platform (Facebook) was seemingly built for global data collection and connection, but it functions perfectly as an intelligence apparatus. It allows agencies to effortlessly map global social networks, establishing who’s who, identify family associations, friendship clusters, where people live, what they do, and every conceivable relationship link. The unmistakable pattern is that if a “free” global service appears on your screen, you can bet that all five million dirty fingers of the US intelligence agencies are deeply embedded in it. Any popular tool that isn’t controlled is immediately flagged as a threat, which is precisely the situation we see playing out with platforms like TikTok and RedNote.

This historical trend — where supposedly benign, decentralized technology serves as a Trojan Horse for state-level data architecture — brings us right back to the core of the blockchain conversation. Bitcoin, in this light, was never the champion of financial freedom it was so skillfully marketed to be. Instead, it was a brilliantly executed, global data collection and public trust-building exercise. It successfully and rapidly normalized critical concepts like: distributed ledger technology, cryptographic public/private key pairs, and the very idea of digital-only, peer-to-peer transactions.

This elaborate experiment allowed covert government players to observe, in real-time and without interference, a pure, globally distributed digital asset in action. They watched how money moved, how fast transactions occurred, how human psychology reacted to extreme market volatility, and where the critical nodes of global activity clustered. All the while, this process established the essential, blockchain infrastructure and its nodes of influences such as — wallets, exchanges, and digital identity management systems — that could be seamlessly absorbed and co-opted when the time was right for the next, final phase of control.

The ultimate and inevitable conclusion of this multi-decade-long financial dry run is the mandated implementation of the CBDC. If the initial phase (Bitcoin) was about building the global infrastructure and getting the public entirely comfortable with digital crypto transactions, the second and final phase is the complete and absolute centralization and control of that infrastructure. This supersedes in functionality the simple digital ledger entry; it is about creating a fully programmable currency. This system grants the state the power to embed rules directly into the money itself, allowing for transaction restrictions, expiration dates on funds, and instantaneous, unquestionable surveillance of every single transfer and money movement — thereby completing the loop of total financial transparency and control that those “decentralized” projects were always intended to facilitate.