Press enter or click to view image in full size

Disclaimer: This article is for informational purposes only and not investment, legal, or technical advice. Data are sourced from public materials listed at the end. The views expressed are my own and do not represent the views of my employer.

Setting the Stage

Since Bitcoin’s debut in 2009, the blockchain has reigned as the foundational structure for decentralized ledgers.
Every transaction is chained sequentially, ensuring a single, immutable record of truth.

But as network demands and global transaction volumes grow, a new contender is stepping forward: the Directed Acyclic Graph (DAG).

Instead of a single, linear chain, DAGs form a web of interconnected transactions that can occur in parallel — many “threads” instead of one “chain.”

While blockchains remain unmatched in decentralization and composability — the ability of smart contracts and decentralized apps to interact seamlessly like Lego bricks — DAG-based systems are emerging as a practical fit for enterprise, infrastructure, and micropayment networks, where speed, predictable cost, and deterministic finality matter more than open DeFi liquidity.

Put simply, DAGs may outperform blockchains in areas like stablecoin payments, corporate settlements, or IoT micropayments, where users need low latency and cost certainty more than composability.
Still, they’re not automatically “better” — stablecoin adoption depends heavily on liquidity depth and network effects, areas where blockchains continue to dominate.

What “Directed Acyclic Graph” Actually Means

The name itself describes the underlying math:

• Directed: Each connection points one way — from an earlier to a later transaction.
• Acyclic: There are no loops; once data flows forward, it never circles back.
• Graph: Instead of a line, the ledger forms a network of linked nodes.

This design allows multiple transactions to confirm each other simultaneously, creating parallelism — a foundation for scalability.

Consensus: One Leader or Many?

Traditional blockchains like Bitcoin or pre-Merge Ethereum elect a single block producer at a time. Competing blocks are discarded (“orphaned”), wasting effort.

Hedera Hashgraph and Kaspa take different routes.

• Hedera replaces leader election with gossip about gossip and virtual voting. Nodes gossip both transactions and metadata about who told them, and when. Each node reconstructs this “hashgraph” locally, reaching consensus without needing extra messages.
• Kaspa uses Proof-of-Work but in a BlockDAG structure. It applies GHOSTDAG, a successor to earlier research called GHOST (Greedy Heaviest Observed Subtree).
  Instead of discarding concurrent blocks, GHOSTDAG orders them, classifying honest ones as “blue” and less-trusted ones as “red.”

Why it Matters

The GHOST concept (2013) showed that even “orphaned” blocks could contribute to network security, improving performance under high block rates.
GHOSTDAG extends that logic — enabling multiple valid blocks to coexist — forming the core of Kaspa’s consensus.

Speed, Latency, and Finality

Traditional blockchains serialize blocks — adding them to the chain one at a time, in strict order. Each block must wait for the previous to be finalized before being added.
That serialization ensures integrity but slows throughput: performance is limited by block size and block time. Confirmation delays can stretch from seconds to minutes.

DAGs break that bottleneck.

Systems like Hedera and Kaspa allow multiple blocks or transactions to be confirmed in parallel.

• Hedera achieves sub-second inclusion and deterministic finality using its BFT algorithm.
• Kaspa achieves few-second confirmations via probabilistic finality that strengthens with each new block.

At a glance:
👉 Kaspa targets around 10 blocks per second (BPS) after its 2025 Crescendo upgrade.
👉 Hedera has demonstrated thousands of TPS in controlled environments.

That parallelism gives DAGs a tangible edge in low-latency, high-volume applications.

Advantages of DAGs

✅ Parallelism: Many transactions can be processed at once.
✅ Low latency: No waiting for a single leader to propose a block.
✅ Resource efficiency: Minimal orphaning or wasted effort.
✅ Predictable fees: Hedera’s transactions cost fractions of a cent.
✅ Scalability: Throughput grows with network connectivity.
✅ Enterprise fit: Deterministic finality suits regulatory and mission-critical environments.
✅ Stablecoin payments: Technically ideal for fast, low-cost transfers — though current adoption is limited by liquidity, not speed.

Disadvantages and Trade-offs

❌ Complexity: Consensus models like GHOSTDAG or virtual voting are harder to implement and verify.
❌ Tooling: Many DeFi frameworks assume chain-based architectures.
❌ Probabilistic finality (PoW DAGs): Kaspa’s confirmations grow reliable over time but aren’t instantaneous.
❌ Parameter tuning: DAGs depend on variables like Kaspa’s K (how many parallel blocks can coexist).
❌ Smaller ecosystems: Developer tools, liquidity, and integrations lag behind major blockchains.
❌ Liquidity gap: DAGs lack deep trading pools and cross-chain infrastructure, limiting stablecoin usability for now.

Case Study: Hedera Hashgraph

Hedera is a Proof-of-Stake DAG governed by enterprise giants such as IBM, Google, and Standard Bank.
Its gossip about gossip protocol delivers near-instant consensus through “virtual voting” — without extra network overhead.

Highlights

• Transaction fees: Fractions of a cent.
• DeFi & Stablecoins: Hosts USDC and SaucerSwap.
• ETFs: 21Shares launched the Hedera ETP (HDRA) on Euronext in 2025; a U.S. ETF filing is pending.
• Corporate use: Avery Dennison’s atma.io uses Hedera for supply-chain carbon tracking; banks like DBS and Standard Bank have tested tokenized finance.
• Reliability: Apart from a short smart contract exploit in 2023, no systemic downtime reported.
• Stack: Built in Java, with SDKs for JS, Go, and Python.

Why it matters:
Hedera’s deterministic finality and enterprise-grade governance make it ideal for regulated tokenization, corporate treasuries, and stablecoin settlement, where cost and compliance predictability are key.

Case Study: Kaspa

Kaspa is a Proof-of-Work DAG, implementing GHOSTDAG to allow multiple blocks simultaneously — essentially a high-speed Bitcoin variant.

Key Facts

• Hard Fork (Crescendo, 2025): Raised throughput to ~10 BPS.
• Latency: Few-second inclusion, faster than legacy PoW.
• Dev Stack: Written in Rust for performance and security.
• Market Data: ~$2B market cap, ~$60–100M daily volume (as of late 2025).
• DeFi: Emerging ecosystem, e.g. Kaspa Finance.
• Institutions: No ETFs yet, though ETP discussions exist.

Network Stability

Kaspa has had excellent uptime, with a few localized stress points:

• Sept 2025: High load caused temporary node and explorer lag (kaspa-ai.com).
• Oct 2025: Kraken reported a 21-hour Kaspa funding delay (isdown.app).
• KRC-20 congestion: Brief transaction slowdowns during token launches (Reddit).

These were ecosystem-level slowdowns, not protocol failures — underscoring a robust core design still scaling its infrastructure.

Where DAGs Outperform

• ⚡ Payments & stablecoins: Faster settlement and lower fees for micro or B2B transactions.
• 🏢 Enterprise tokenization: Governance and cost predictability for corporates.
• 🔗 IoT micropayments: Ideal for massive, small-value data transfers.
• 🧾 Regulated infrastructure: Finality and auditability for compliance-heavy sectors.

Where Blockchains Still Dominate

• 💧 DeFi liquidity & composability: Deep, interconnected protocols remain on Ethereum and its peers.
• 🔐 Battle-tested security: Bitcoin and Ethereum’s track records remain unmatched.
• 🧰 Tooling: Wallets, SDKs, and oracles are standardized.
• 💵 Stablecoin dominance: Most stablecoin activity (USDC, USDT) remains on chain ecosystems.
• 🏛️ Regulatory frameworks: Custody and compliance models are tailored to blockchains.

The Takeaway

DAGs aren’t “better blockchains.” They’re a parallel evolution — optimized for throughput, latency, and deterministic performance rather than open DeFi composability.

• Parallelism replaces serialization.
• Virtual voting or GHOSTDAG replaces leader election.
• Instant or deterministic finality replaces multi-block confirmations.

Hedera shows what enterprise-ready consensus can look like — stable, low-cost, and governed by global institutions.
Kaspa demonstrates how Proof-of-Work can evolve to handle modern throughput demands.

Enterprises are likely to adopt DAGs first because they value predictability, governance, and settlement speed over experimental composability.
For stablecoin payments, DAGs provide a strong technical foundation — fast, cheap, and secure — but they’ll need greater liquidity and interoperability before matching blockchain’s network effects.

If blockchains built the highways of decentralized finance, DAGs may power the next generation of high-speed payment rails — invisible, efficient, and built for the real economy.

References

1. Hedera learning — “What is gossip about gossip?”: https://hedera.com/learning/hedera-hashgraph/what-is-gossip-about-gossip
2. Hedera Docs (GitHub): https://github.com/hashgraph/hedera-docs
3. Springer (2025) — Overview of DAG-Based Blockchain Protocols and Their Trade-Offs: https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-032-04728-1_2
4. Hedera learning — “DAG vs Blockchain”: https://hedera.com/learning/distributed-ledger-technologies/dag-vs-blockchain
5. Hedera DeFi Metrics (DefiLlama): https://defillama.com/chain/Heder
6. Hedera status page: https://status.hedera.com/
7. Hedera blog — March 2023 incident analysis: https://hedera.com/blog/analysis-remediation-of-the-precompile-attack-on-the-hedera-network
8. Asset Tokenization Studio: https://hedera.com/blog/asset-tokenization-studio
9. Avery Dennison atma.io press release: https://rfid.averydennison.com/en/home/news-insights/press-releases/avery-dennisons-atma-io-connected-product-cloud-to-utilize-the-Hedera-network-to-account-for-carbon-emissions-of-billions-of-unique-items.html
10. DappRadar Hedera rankings: https://dappradar.com/rankings/protocol/hedera
11. 21Shares Hedera ETP (HDRA): https://www.globenewswire.com/news-release/2025/06/03/3092459/0/en/21Shares-Launches-21Shares-Hedera-ETP-HDRA-on-Euronext.html
12. Kaspa overview, market & volume: https://coinmarketcap.com/currencies/kaspa/
13. Kaspa futures / spot volume: https://www.coinglass.com/currencies/KAS
14. Kaspa ETF speculation: https://dapp.expert/news/en_prospects-of-kaspa-etf-approval-in-2025
15. Kaspa DeFi layer: https://kaspafinance.io/
16. Kaspa stablecoin speculation: https://captainaltcoin.com/why-everyone-suddenly-loves-kaspa-and-what-could-happen-next-for-kas-price/
17. Kaspa stress report (Sept 2025): https://kaspa-ai.com/daily-pulse/2025-09-28-kaspa-network-stressed-as-l2-chaos-unfolds/?utm_source=chatgpt.com
18. Kraken funding delay (Oct 2025): https://isdown.app/status/kraken/incidents/453503-kaspa-kas-funding-delays?utm_source=chatgpt.com
19. Reddit congestion thread (KRC-20 launch): https://www.redditmedia.com/r/kaspa/comments/1fiq3r4/for_anyone_wondering_why_kaspa_network_was_so/?utm_source=chatgpt.com
20. Kaspa hashrate monitor: https://www.kaspa.report/hashrate?utm_source=chatgpt.com