Why Traceability Matters: The Data-Driven Case for Blockchain in Zakat, Waqf, and Social Finance

Introduction: Money With a Mission… But No Map
Zakat. Waqf. Sadaqah. Social funds.
All of them carry the weight of amanah — trust.
But here’s the irony, Bro:
We treat these funds like they’re holy and invincible, but behind the scenes, many are still managed with manual forms, ageing spreadsheets, and approvals that feel like they’ve been trapped in a time capsule since 1998.
Money meant for the poor often passes through a maze of processes that nobody can fully track. And when something goes wrong?
- Donors get frustrated.
- Institutions get blamed.
- Communities suffer in silence.
Let’s just say — the “trust us” model that worked 20 years ago…
doesn’t survive the digital era anymore.
And that’s where blockchain — yes, that word people love to argue about — steps in not as hype, but as a data-driven solution for governance.
Today, we’re pulling receipts: academic studies, audit reports, and real-world failures that prove why traceability isn’t a luxury — it’s a survival requirement for social finance.
TL;DR
Leakages, inefficient processes, and opaque fund management still plague zakat, waqf, and social finance institutions, as documented in academic research and public audit reports. Blockchain solves these issues through real-time traceability, immutable records, purpose-locked funds, and automated governance. With billions in Islamic social finance at stake, traceability isn’t just a tech feature — it’s an ethical obligation that protects donors, institutions, and beneficiaries.
1. The Reality Check: Leakages in Social Finance Aren’t Fiction — They’re Documented
People often assume zakat and waqf funds are perfectly managed because they’re religious obligations.
But the data slaps us awake.
What real research says (yes, actual peer-reviewed papers):
1.1 Poor governance leads to leakages
- Wahid et al. (2004) found systemic weaknesses that delay distribution and create leakage vulnerability.
- Saad & Farouk (2019) identified “inefficiencies and opaque processes” that reduce institutional effectiveness.
1.2 Waqf management suffers from outdated systems
- Adnan & Bakar (2009) showed that manual record-keeping creates audit difficulties and transparency gaps in waqf.
1.3 Donor trust is declining
- Multiple studies observed that donors worry about where their zakat actually goes, especially without real-time reporting.
When researchers start using words like “inefficiency”, “weak governance”, “delayed disbursements”, “opacity”, it’s a polite academic way of saying:
“The system isn’t working as intended.”
2. The Auditor-General Reports Make It Worse
Let’s be brutally honest, Bro — nothing exposes financial mismanagement like national audit reports.
Auditor-General’s Report Malaysia 2022
- Identified RM681.71 million in losses due to weak oversight, poor documentation, and mismanagement.
- Highlighted repeated issues in fund disbursement controls.
Indonesia (BPK RI)
- Found multiple high-risk areas in social fund management with inadequate internal controls.
OECD (2021)
- Classified charity and social-finance ecosystems as “high leakage zones” without digital transparency.
The pattern is obvious:
Where there is no traceability, there is no accountability.
Where there is no accountability, leakages thrive.
3. The Heart of the Problem: Social Finance Runs on Outdated Systems
Even big institutions still use:
- Manual approval chains
- Paper-based receipts
- Separate databases that don’t talk to each other
- Annual reports that summarise the past after everything is too late
And here’s the Gen-Z truth nobody wants to admit:
“If you can track your Shopee parcel in real time, why can’t you track zakat funds?”
This is a governance gap, not a technical gap.
4. Why Traceability Matters (More Than Ever)
4.1 Traceability rebuilds public trust
Donors hate feeling blind. Real-time visibility gives them confidence:
- “Where is my money right now?”
- “Who approved this?”
- “Has it reached the recipient?”
Transparency stops rumours before they start.
4.2 Traceability protects institutions from blame
Imagine having a full audit trail where every action is recorded:
- Time
- Actor
- Amount
- Purpose
- Status
It becomes impossible to scapegoat the institution when everything is provable.
Auditors love it.
Regulators love it.
The public loves it.
4.3 Traceability eliminates accidental misuse
Not all leakages are malicious — most are due to:
- Wrong entries
- Lost forms
- Double disbursement
- Forgotten approvals
- Manual mistakes
Traceability forces discipline.
4.4 Traceability allows real-time monitoring by regulators
BNM, State Islamic Councils, audit bodies — all can have live dashboards.
No more:
Get Masverse’s stories in your inbox
Join Medium for free to get updates from this writer.
“Please wait for our quarterly reconciliation.”
It becomes:
“Click here for live data.”
5. How Blockchain Solves the Traceability Problem
Forget the crypto hype.
Forget NFTs.
Forget the jargon.
Blockchain’s value here is simple and powerful:
5.1 Immutable Records = No Cover Ups
Once recorded, it cannot be deleted or altered.
Perfect for:
- Zakat disbursement
- Waqf distribution
- NGO fund management
- Social programmes
5.2 Every ‘sen’ is traceable
From donor → institution → programme → recipient.
5.3 Smart contracts automate governance
Rules can be encoded like:
- “Disburse only when eligibility is verified.”
- “Cap at RM X per recipient.”
- “Release funds only to approved vendors.”
5.4 Purpose-bound money lock funds
Funds can’t be used for anything outside the specified purpose.
This is huge for:
- Waqf schools
- Zakat asnaf categories
- Emergency relief funds
5.5 Audit-ready by default
Auditors don’t chase data.
Data chases them.
6. The Data-Driven Case for Blockchain in Islamic Social Finance
6.1 Islamic social finance is massive
USD 3 trillion globally (ICD–Refinitiv, 2022).
Even 1% leakage = USD 30 billion loss.
6.2 Digitisation boosts efficiency
World Bank studies show that digital governance improves:
- Speed
- Fairness
- Accountability
6.3 Shariah prefers transparent systems
Shariah’s essence:
- No ambiguity
- No deception
- Fairness
- Justice
Blockchain aligns naturally.
7. So… Why Isn’t Everyone Using It Yet?
Because institutions fear:
- Change
- Public transparency
- Technology adoption
- Being exposed
- The governance overhaul required
But the longer they wait,
the more trust they lose.
And once trust dies,
it is almost impossible to resurrect.
8. The Future: Traceability as a Religious and Ethical Obligation
This is where it gets philosophical.
Islam didn’t ask us to just give.
Islam asks us to protect the trust.
Blockchain isn’t replacing the human heart -
it’s protecting it.
It is the tool that ensures:
- The donor’s sincerity is respected
- The institution’s responsibility is upheld
- The recipient’s dignity is preserved
Traceability is not about technology.
It is about Amanah.
References
2. OECD 2021, Public Integrity Indicators, OECD Publishing.
4. Transparency International Malaysia 2022, Annual Report 2022.
5. Wahid, H., Ahmad, S., & Mohd Noor, M.A. 2004, Issues and Challenges in Zakat Management, Jurnal Ekonomi Malaysia.
6. World Bank 2022, Islamic Finance and Halal Economy — Malaysia.
7. ICD–Refinitiv 2022, Islamic Finance Development Report.


